Prof
Jing Chen - I tried to understand life systems from
the thermodynamic laws since I was an undergraduate
student. I hope to develop a mathematical theory
of life systems parallel to rational mechanics as a mathematical
theory of general systems. I read about many existing theories,
such as Prigogine’s
theory. However, these theories do not model
life process directly. For a long time, I had
little idea how to develop such a theory. I only knew that thermodynamic
processes are represented by partial differential equations. So
I stick to the theory of partial differential equations, hoping
something will happen some day.
It was after many years before I bumped into
the Black-Scholes equation. The Black-Scholes
equation was originated in financial economics.
But from my perspective, this equation is a mapping
from lognormal processes, which can be understood
as the representation of extracting low entropy
to compensate for dissipation. Immediately, I
realized the Black-Scholes theory is exactly
what I was looking for. Although I started to
think about it in 1995, shortly after I went
to Hong Kong, it was not until 2000, while I
was in Singapore, I worked out an analytical
thermodynamic theory of economics based on option
theory. It took me two more years to develop
a new
version directly from the thermodynamic
theory, without depending on the analogy to the
option theory.
Since human activities are mainly measured by
economic values, we need to answer how thermodynamic
value is related to economic value. I took a
trip from Singapore to Vancouver in August, 2000.
On the plane I read Shannon’s classical
paper that established information theory. Soon
I realized that value can be defined exactly
the same way as information: the reduction of
entropy. I wrote down the draft on the plane.
But it took me two years before I finally wrote
the paper. I shall briefly compare our theory
of value with the mainstream theory of value.
There are two versions of theory of value. The
first one is the popular version taught in classrooms,
which defines value as scarce resources. The
second one is the formal version represented
by Debreu’s Theory of Value, which does
not provide a measurable quantity of value. The
popular version and the formal version are disconnected.
Our theory defines value as a function of scarcity
and provides a rigorous and easy to apply mathematical
theory of value. The entropy theory of value
offers a unified understanding of physical entropy,
information and economic value. It provides a
quantitative measure of value that is highly
consistent with our intuitive understanding.
Many people do not agree that theories of social
sciences should be derived from physical laws.
They argue that physical laws are fixed while
the human mind is free. So I was driven to better
understand mind. The mind of animals, just like
the bodies of animals, is shaped by natural selection
to best adapt to environment. Specifically, the
mind is evolved to search for natural resources
at low cost. Since entropy provides a universal
measure of resources, it is inevitable that information,
which we collect for our survival, is represented
by the entropy function mathematically. When
observing the problems of the mind from the lens
of physical laws, many complex and confusing
problems become simple and clear. The entropy
theory of mind provides a simple and unified
understanding of many patterns in human psychology
and market patterns documented in the literature
of behavioral finance. This shows that research
on mind, just like research on matter, can be
carried out in an analytical, quantitative and
systematic way from the foundation of physical
laws.
From the information theory, the amount of information
an audience can receive is the amount of information
sent minus equivocation, which is a function
of correlation between the sender and receivers
of information. For a new theory, the equivocation
is extremely high. After I established the theoretical
foundation, I write about the applications in
different fields to make it easier for other
researchers to apply to their own works.
Most of the new theories are first circulated
through informal channels. My papers have generated
over eleven thousand downloads on Social Science
Research Network. I also receive generous help
from many people, such as Professor James Galbraith,
who introduced me to Professor Philip Arestis.
I am very grateful that the conference organizers
give me a precious opportunity to present my
ideas.
Link to Prof Jing Chen's book, The Physical Foundation of Economics,
An Analytical Thermodynamic Theory.
<< Back
|